For 60 years, the EEO-1 report has been a fixture of HR compliance, so much so that most of us have never known a workplace without it. Now the EEOC has proposed rescinding the EEO-1 (along with the EEO-2 through EEO-6 reports), and while nothing is final yet, the proposal is widely expected to move forward. That leaves HR leaders facing a pivotal question: if the federal report goes away, what happens to the workforce demographic data behind it? This session cuts through the uncertainty. We'll unpack what a rescission would actually change, and, just as importantly, what it wouldn't. Attendees will learn the pros and cons of collecting and analyzing workforce data, from recordkeeping obligations under Title VII to a growing patchwork of state and local pay-data and reporting laws that still speak in "EEO-1 terms." We'll also explore the practical benefits employers could gain and the real risk of confusion if a 60-year-old federal standard goes away without clear guidance to replace it.
Rethinking Workforce Data After EEO-1
Session Type: Breakout Session
Session Tracks: I&D & Legal Compliance
Learning Outcome 1: Understand the scope and significance of the proposed EEO-1 rescission, including the critical distinction between the federal reporting obligation that would be removed and the recordkeeping, preservation, and compliance duties that would remain fully in force.
Learning Outcome 2: Identify the continuing federal, state, and local obligations, and the legitimate business reasons, that would keep workforce demographic data relevant even without a federal filing requirement, including pay-equity audits, litigation and investigation readiness, and state laws modeled on EEO-1 categories.
Learning Outcome 3: Evaluate the confidentiality, security, and misuse considerations that shape responsible data practices, distinguishing lawful aggregate, non-decisional analysis from the individualized use of protected characteristics that creates legal risk.
- Tuesday, Nov 172:30 PM - 3:30 PM CST
Speakers

Partner, Seyfarth Shaw LLP